Religion is an old boring topic, about the 911 crap… Im pretty sure any well motivated martyr could accomplish any complicated undertaking and it STILL makes more sense that 911 attacks were not the us gov. Im from canada, our economies are tied in together pretty tight whether or not you agree and after 91 our money is almost worth more than the US so why would the US gov depreciate their own reserve? For the capitialisation of a few? maybe but it makes more sense that the Laden family would want to capitalise on Us venture knowing upcoming events (think enron, martha stewart)..

MAXIM magazine, of all sources, knew their would be an attack on the US and they also published an article about the levy’s failing YEARS before both happened so instead of questioning badly mad movies why not read some shit, put the documentary movies away (theyre all biased, ALL of them) and look into stuff yourselves.

NAZI propeganda became an industry (agresive advertising), there was no conspiracy there, just a few fools scaring oter people to follow them then lying to the public about their intentions. Im sure Bush was hiding something but I doubt it was his hands that did this.

I dont get how tower 7, nearly a block away could fall while the buildings surrounding it are still up today and that the twin towers REALLY could not fall without explosives yet the use of any sort of detonation or explosive devices are denied to this day? IMO Thermite was probably used but by terrorists. The pentagon was hit by a plane. Youd be amazed what a difference a plane reck will make when your TRYING to land a plane safely or just tryign to make a big mess. In the bigg mess senario Im sure there would be less debris! When you drop a glass it might break into 5 or 7 pieces but when you throw a glass at a brick wall there is virtually nothing left.

These movies prey off the hopelessly ignorant BUT posters like the Admin and David are equally ignorant. Slander alone is not jstifiable evidence even if it was entertaining or true. throw in some meaning or your nothing more than an anti-documentarian.
For reals, all you do is moan about how crappy these kinds of movies these are but your not doing ANYTHING that these movies arent!? Its just more IMO but presented with witty critisism so even the brighter idiots can chuckle a bit and say huhuh, maybe hes right – but based on nothing more than witty insults.

bravo, most of these comments are epic fails, the most literate of the bunch make vague references to far off allegories – but sound smart – and offer no insight whatsoever to the movie CONTENT. sure the drug induced audio/visuals are thick but pick your favorite movie and tell me they dont use similar tactics (regardless of their budget). Ever seen Carl Sagan’ cosmos series? its effets are pretty much the same but even thought the guy sounds like kermit the frog I believe him

If I take nothing else from these two movies (zeitgeist: the movie and zeitgeist: addendum, which are available for free on the internet, since they were not made with profit in mind… unlike nearmost everything else)…
…they still were a damn good, worthy watch.

Don't listen to unsupported bullshit.. that applies to this criticism here as much as zeitgeist or other "FEBL" (as this gentleman refers to them) movie, but rather use critical thinking to make up your own minds.

But naturally it is essential to make fun of things and we should criticize everything. Comedy, for instance, is in my opinion one of the most liberal and unfiltered/uncontrolled forms of free speech. I point to this video as an example of the inherent genius in comedy; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa-4E8ZDj9s

Also for those that want to see the Zeitgeist films and judge for themselves, here are a couple of links;
Zeitgeist: The Movie – http://www.watchzeitgeist.com/zeitgeist.html
Zeitgeist: Addendum – http://www.watchzeitgeist.com/