<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mr Untouchable (Trailer)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smashingtelly.com/2008/09/23/mr-untouchable-trailer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smashingtelly.com/2008/09/23/mr-untouchable-trailer/</link>
	<description>A hand picked TV channel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:10:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Nordquist</title>
		<link>http://smashingtelly.com/2008/09/23/mr-untouchable-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-1409</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Nordquist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 07:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smashingtelly.com/2008/09/23/mr-untouchable-trailer/#comment-1409</guid>
		<description>No, this was a kind of regulated trade; there are some neat details in New York Magazine&#039;s articles, where they take notes on the film and interview the subjects of the film, who eventually served lots of jail time and and are -retired- now, which is a whole other thing failing, mister enemy-of-libertarians.
     I think there&#039;s a matter of what messed-up situations we would choose to publicly declare our desires and/or have them checked.  It used to be that people would ask one another whether illicit substances were worth pursuing and tell one another how to run an awesome general store or smithy and still take a profit, or have functionaries who were worth a lick ponder that stuff.  That kind of behavioral shit is so totally taboo, now, that it is sensible for the yellow pages to have some grey-coded category where one could just get a Whitman&#039;s Original-Recipie Fried Meth Sampler.  Risk compliance filing FAIL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, this was a kind of regulated trade; there are some neat details in New York Magazine&#8217;s articles, where they take notes on the film and interview the subjects of the film, who eventually served lots of jail time and and are -retired- now, which is a whole other thing failing, mister enemy-of-libertarians.<br />
     I think there&#8217;s a matter of what messed-up situations we would choose to publicly declare our desires and/or have them checked.  It used to be that people would ask one another whether illicit substances were worth pursuing and tell one another how to run an awesome general store or smithy and still take a profit, or have functionaries who were worth a lick ponder that stuff.  That kind of behavioral shit is so totally taboo, now, that it is sensible for the yellow pages to have some grey-coded category where one could just get a Whitman&#8217;s Original-Recipie Fried Meth Sampler.  Risk compliance filing FAIL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

